Harvard professors argue that America needs a 'militant democracy' to stop Trump

Harvard professors Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt advised pushing a "militant democracy" to ensure an "authoritarian figure" for illustration erstwhile President Trump ne'er rises to powerfulness again.

In an op-ed for nan New York Times, Levitsky and Ziblatt picture really they spent nan past twelvemonth "researching really democracies tin protect themselves from authoritarian threats from within," lamenting really adjacent Trump remains to getting a 2nd term.

"How could specified an openly authoritarian fig person a coin flip’s chance of returning to nan presidency? Why person truthful galore of our democracy’s defenses seemingly surgery down, and which, if any, remain?" they wrote.

Republican statesmanlike nominee, erstwhile U.S. President Donald Trump reacts to supporters arsenic he arrives for a run rally astatine East Carolina University connected October 21, 2024 successful Greenville, North Carolina. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

One of nan ways they suggested limiting figures for illustration Trump’s emergence to powerfulness was a "militant aliases protect democracy" which they described arsenic a measurement authorities tin restrict aliases outlaw reside against "antidemocratic forces."

TRUMP RESPONDS TO EX-CHIEF OF STAFF AFTER HE'S LABELED 'AUTHORITARIAN' AND THE 'GENERAL DEFINITION OF FASCIST'

"Born successful West Germany arsenic a consequence to Europe’s antiauthoritarian failures successful nan 1930s, nan militant populist attack empowers nationalist authorities to wield nan norm of rule against antidemocratic forces. Haunted by nan acquisition of Hitler’s emergence to powerfulness via nan ballot box, West German law designers created ineligible and administrative procedures that allowed nan authorities to restrict and moreover outlaw ‘anti-constitutional’ speech, groups and parties," they wrote.

Though they acknowledged "significant drawbacks" that could beryllium "easily abused" successful this strategy by politicians, they based on really it whitethorn beryllium amended than simply relying connected electoral title aliases nan "laissez-faire approach" to benignant retired bad ideas.

Levitsky and Ziblatt encouraged a "militant" attack to policing authoritarian figures and speech. (AP/Alex Brandon)

"Electoral title is, of course, basal to democracy. But a laissez-faire attack has 2 important limitations. First, successful nan United States, title is distorted by an 18th-century institution, nan Electoral College, that allows predetermination losers to triumph power. In 1 sense, nan electoral marketplace worked successful 2016 nan measurement it is theoretically expected to: More Americans voted for Hillary Clinton than for Mr. Trump. But nan Electoral College permitted an authoritarian fig who won less votes to go president," they wrote. "In addition, history shows america that electoral title unsocial is insufficient to fend disconnected extremist threats. Good ideas don’t ever triumph out. And candidates seeking to subvert populist don’t ever lose."

Levitsky and Ziblatt criticized nan "tepid" attack from politicians arsenic good arsenic starring businesses and belief institutions connected calling retired aliases limiting Trump’s rise.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE

Levitsky and Ziblatt implored businesses and belief institutions to speak retired publically against Trump. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

"The U.S. constitution is sleepwalking toward a crisis. An openly antidemocratic fig stands astatine slightest a 50-50 chance of winning nan presidency. The Supreme Court and nan Republican Party person abdicated their gatekeeping responsibilities, and excessively galore of America’s astir influential political, business and belief leaders stay connected nan sidelines. Unable to emergence supra fearfulness aliases constrictive ambition, they hedge their bets. But clip is moving out. What are they waiting for?" they concluded.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP