Moral dilemma for Washington Post readers who canceled subscriptions but can't live without Amazon

Sedang Trending 3 hari yang lalu

Washington Post readers boycotting nan insubstantial aft proprietor Jeff Bezos refused to make a statesmanlike endorsement admit they're struggling to springiness up Amazon.  

More than 200,000 WaPo readers - retired of 2.5 cardinal - person truthful acold ended their subscriptions, but immoderate are admitting its harder to springiness up nan convenience of Bezos' acold much lucrative online shopping behemoth.

Liberal writer Joan Walsh took to X to proudly state her fury complete nan non-endorsement, writing: 'I conscionable canceled my subscription to @washingtonpost. You should too.' 

But asked successful her replies she would cancel her Amazon subscription, Walsh instantly compromised her stance, writing: 'Much harder but considering...' 

Some Washington Post readers for illustration writer Joan Walsh, who cancelled their subscriptions aft nan insubstantial decided not to endorse Kamala Harris, are having problem besides boycotting Amazon

Liberal writer Joan Walsh was 1 of nan X users who admitted that while she was capable to fto spell of her WaPo subscription, she was keeping her Amazon account

X personification Liz Calloway shared an image of her Post subscription cancellation while adding, ''If I were a amended personification I would cancel my Amazon Prime membership, too.'

X personification Liz Callaway shared an image of her Post subscription cancellation while adding, ''If I were a amended personification I would cancel my Amazon Prime membership, too.' 

Another added: 'I did cancel my longtime WaPo subscription, and I'm sourcing nan things I want from Amazon from different places. It's hard, I'll admit. 

Some Bezos critics based on that they canceled nan Post because it stopped doing its occupation to inform, while Amazon is still doing what it's expected to.

One X personification wrote: 'I didn't cancel Amazon Prime because that's still a work that delivers connected its promises.' 

The Washington Post said Friday it would not endorse a campaigner for president successful this year’s tightly contested title and would debar doing truthful successful nan future.

The paper's page editor David Shipley had already approved an endorsement of Harris and had reportedly told colleagues that it was being reviewed by nan paper's owner Bezos, according to NPR.

Some Bezos critics based on that they canceled nan Post because it stopped doing its occupation to inform, while Amazon is still doing what it's expected to.

The announcement marks nan first clip successful 36 years that nan left-leaning insubstantial has decided to not make a statesmanlike endorsement. 

Columnist Robert Kagan, a blimpish Trump critic, resigned from his position successful nan editorial committee aft nan determination emerged. 

In an article posted connected nan beforehand of its website, nan Post — reporting connected its ain soul workings — besides quoted unidentified sources wrong nan publication arsenic saying that an endorsement of Kamala Harris complete Donald Trump had been written but not published. 

Those sources told nan Post reporters that Bezos made nan decision.

The Post’s publisher, Will Lewis, wrote successful a file that nan determination was really a return to a contented nan insubstantial had years agone of not endorsing candidates. He said it reflected nan paper’s religion successful 'our readers' expertise to dress up their ain minds.'

The page editor had reportedly told colleagues that it was being reviewed by nan paper's proprietor Jeff Bezos. The Post itself has reported that it was Bezos who made nan determination to not endorse a statesmanlike candidate

Columnist Robert Kagan, a blimpish Trump critic, resigned from his position successful nan editorial committee aft nan determination emerged

The station began endorsing statesmanlike candidates successful 1976 aft it collapsed nan Watergate ungraded and publically backed Democrat Jimmy Carter - 'for understandable reasons astatine nan time,' nan insubstantial said.

However, it declined to make an endorsement successful 1988 betwixt George H.W. Bush and Michael Dukakis.

All of its endorsements since Carter person been Democrats.

The Post’s move travel nan aforesaid week that nan Los Angeles Times announced a akin decision, which triggered nan resignations of its editorial page editor and 2 different members of nan editorial board. 

Los Angeles Times editors were asked to reasonably analyse some Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, but chose to opportunity thing instead, according to nan paper's owner Dr Pat Soon-Shiong

In that instance, nan Times’ owner, Patrick Soon-Shiong, insisted he had not censored nan editorial board, which had planned to endorse Harris.

'As an owner, I’m connected nan editorial committee and I shared pinch our editors that possibly this twelvemonth we person a column, a page, 2 pages, if we want, of each nan pros and each nan cons and fto nan readers decide,' Soon-Shiong said successful an question and reply Thursday pinch Spectrum News. He said he feared endorsing a campaigner would adhd to nan country’s division.

Mariel Garza told nan Columbia Journalism Review successful an question and reply that she resigned because nan Times was remaining silent connected nan title successful “dangerous times.”

'I americium resigning because I want to make it clear that I americium not OK pinch america being silent,' Garza said. 'In vulnerable times, honorable group request to guidelines up. This is really I’m opinionated up.'

Sumber Daily Mail News
Daily Mail News