My boyfriend called me 'controlling' after I asked him not to wear Crocs on date night

A female has revealed she was branded 'controlling' by her fellow aft she begged him to extremity wearing Crocs connected their day nights.

The unnamed female took to Reddit to uncover that she had pleaded pinch her person to debar donning nan clogs that are made from croslite, which is simply a worldly resembling  rubber. 

Her petition sparked a fiery statement betwixt nan lovebirds arsenic her fellow refused to return nan Crocs disconnected of his feet, pinch him moreover sporting them erstwhile they attended lavish restaurants. 

In a thread titled, Am I The A**hole, she questioned if she was successful nan incorrect for asking him to debar nan clogs. 

She confessed that though he claimed she was being 'controlling', she felt for illustration she was 'going crazy' trying to explicate why she didn't want him pairing his ensembles pinch Crocs. 

The station was titled: 'Am I nan a**hole for asking my fellow not to deterioration Crocs connected dates?' 

She explained: 'My fellow (23M) and I (22F) are medium/long region (two hours) and only spot each different connected nan weekends. We’ve been going retired to nicer restaurants and bars for dinners and going connected tiny dates. 

'When we went pome picking, I asked him not to deterioration Crocs because it’s muddy, slippery, etc. It started a mini statement but yet he switched to boots. When we went retired to meal that night, he wore nan Crocs again.

'We are readying our Halloween costumes and nan adjacent clip we spot each different and I asked him if he would deterioration shoes different than Crocs. More than conscionable nan functionality part, they conscionable aren’t really what you deterioration erstwhile going to bars aliases eating astatine bully restaurants.' 

Her pleas went ignored arsenic her fellow claimed that they were nan cleanable attire for a nighttime retired connected nan town. 

The woman's fellow besides fired backmost arsenic he branded her 'controlling.' 

She said: 'He moreover admitted to not wearing Crocs to schoolhouse often (PhD) arsenic he “dresses nicer for school”. I deliberation it’s nosy picking retired tiny outfits I cognize he likes and doing my constitution erstwhile I get to spot him. 

'When I asked if he doesn’t for illustration dressing up erstwhile we spot each other, he said that it shouldn’t matter what you wear. Like yes, but besides there’s a logic why group don’t deterioration Crocs to weddings aliases occupation interviews.

'He feels for illustration I americium controlling him by asking him not to deterioration Crocs, and I conjecture I am, but I consciousness for illustration I’m going crazy trying to explicate to him why Crocs aren’t a footwear for each azygous occasion.   

'I’m not trying to propulsion retired his Crocs aliases anything, but I conscionable really for illustration it erstwhile he dresses a small nicer and doesn't deterioration sweatpants and Crocs out.' 

At nan extremity of nan post, nan 22-year-old admitted that her fellow branded her 'superficial' arsenic she begged group connected nan web for their advice. 

Social media users flocked to nan comments conception and ran to nan woman's defense arsenic they criticized her boyfriend. 

One personification said: 'Not nan a**hole. You're not being "controlling" by asking him to look bully erstwhile you spell retired to a bully place. You're asking him to beryllium respectful of nan juncture and setting. That's conscionable bully manners.

'He tin beryllium bothered to dress bully for school, but not for you. That sucks.'

Someone other wrote: 'Not nan a**hole but this is astir apt not your person. He evidently does not attraction capable astir you to deterioration shoes. You tin do better.'

Another personification commented: 'Yes you tin inquire him to dress for illustration an big connected dates, sheesh.'

'NTA nan truth that he makes much of an effort to beryllium presentable for schoolhouse than he does for a day pinch you is beautiful telling,' 1 personification said. 

However, different group connected nan web claimed that nan female was not taking her boyfriend's feelings into consideration. 

'You're nan a**hole. Let him beryllium him,' said 1 user. 

Another personification wrote: 'This is hilarious. you do not get to determine really personification other dresses. For a bully edifice I could understand, it's bully to fto personification cognize they mightiness look silly aliases inappropriate, but for pome picking and for bars, those shoes are perfectly reasonable. Do you conscionable want a fellow for nan aesthetic? You're nan a**hole.'

Someone other commented: 'You're nan a**hole and stuck up too. Assuming your fellow doesn’t attraction astir you origin of nan shoes he wears. How superficial are you? You can’t constabulary what he wears conscionable for illustration he shouldn’t constabulary what you wear.'