The woman who thinks Meghan Markle has the 'worst judgement': Princess Diana's former confidante claims Duchess of Sussex is 'addicted to drama' and 'didn't understand' her role in the Royal Family

In nan 27 years since Princess Diana's passing, overmuch has been written astir nan royal's authorities of mind successful her last months.

But fewer group were granted arsenic adjacent entree to nan precocious Princess of Wales arsenic Tina Brown. 

In July 1997, conscionable 2 months earlier nan tragic mishap successful Paris, nan royal mother-of-two met nan erstwhile Vanity Fair editor for luncheon successful New York pinch Anna Wintour.

Detailing their gathering successful a individual effort for The New Yorker, Tina marvelled astatine nan Princess' 'shrewd' attack to nationalist relations - an area she believes Meghan Markle is lacking in.

Earlier this month, nan journalist appeared connected The Ankler podcast - wherever she based on nan Duchess of Sussex 'has nan worst judgement of anyone successful nan full world' and dubbed Megxit a 'disaster'.

However, this isn't nan first clip Tina has taken purpose astatine nan Duchess of Sussex successful public.

In 2022, The Diana Chronicles writer accused nan erstwhile Suits character of 'not understanding' really difficult her mother-in-law had to activity to go a 'humanitarian superstar'. 

In her book The Palace Papers, an insider told Tina that Meghan 'hated each second' of her Australia circuit successful 2018 and claimed nan sojourn was 'pointless'.

Months later, nan influential editor besides said nan Duke and Duchess 'completely underestimated' what life without nan 'palace platform' would beryllium for illustration - arguing that Meghan lacks a defined 'brand' and alternatively latches connected nan 'Twitter origin of nan moment'.

Here FEMAIL takes a look backmost astatine really Meghan Markle mislaid a imaginable state successful 1 of Princess Diana's astir influential friends. 

Meghan wasn't prepared to 'work for illustration a dog' for illustration Diana? 

Two years ago, Tina Brown released her book The Palace Papers - wherever she delved into nan fall-out of Megxit.

While promoting nan book, nan writer claimed that Meghan 'didn't understand her role' successful nan Firm during an quality connected ITV's Lorraine.

According to Tina, Meghan looked to nan illustration of Princess Diana and thought that she could travel nan aforesaid path.

However, she based on that nan Duchess did not recognise nan 'great woody of very humdrum assignments' Diana undertook connected behalf of nan Firm earlier she became nan icon she remains today. 

'I deliberation that was her basal consciousness of misunderstanding of what was going to hap erstwhile she joined nan Royal Family - she saw nan palaces and Diana arsenic this world humanitarian ace star, but forgot that for 16 aliases 17 years Diana worked for illustration a canine wrong nan Royal Family doing a awesome woody of very humdrum assignments. 

'It was her charisma she brought to nan occupation that made her truthful extraordinarily special.' 

The writer said nan mates made 'bad choices' and could person near nan royal family connected acold amended position if they weren't arsenic 'hotheaded' erstwhile they made nan determination to measurement backmost from their roles arsenic moving royals. 

Meghan Markle 'hated each second' of her Australia tour 

Elsewhere successful her book, Tina alleged that Meghan 'hated each second' of her Australia circuit and labelled nan sojourn 'pointless'.

Despite nan lukewarm reception and a lively itinerary, Brown claims a Palace staffer told her that Meghan really loathed nan trip. 

'So, Meghan must person been thrilled pinch it each … right? No. She apparently hated each 2nd of it,' she wrote.

'She didn't understand why things were group up successful that way. Instead of being excited erstwhile thousands of group showed up astatine nan Opera House, it was very overmuch like, 'What's nan purpose? I don't understand this',' a Palace worker told Brown. 

The staffer said Meghan didn't look to grasp nan 'representational role' of nan British monarchy erstwhile they toured, adding she was much willing successful 'causes she wanted to spotlight'. 

Brown's claims are supported successful an article printed successful The Times in 2021, which asserted that Meghan recovered it 'silly' erstwhile group crowded to spot nan Sussexes erstwhile they arrived successful Sydney.

'What are they each doing here? It's silly,' she reportedly said to her team. A root said that she simply 'didn't get it'.

The Sussexes completed 75 engagements successful 16 days crossed Australia, New Zealand, Fiji and Tonga during nan whirlwind circuit - each while Meghan was successful nan early stages of her first pregnancy. 

They were often pictured having friendly conversations, embracing fans aliases receiving galore gifts from admirers during their clip Down Under.

Brown claims successful her book that 1 of nan main things Meghan took distant from nan circuit was her and Harry's unrecognised value successful nan royal hierarchy. 

'It was head-turning for Meghan to acquisition nan full-throttle motorcade-purring, outrider-vrooming, crowd-roaring adulation of a celebrated young royal connected a circuit planned to nan past teacup by nan Palace machine.

'Meghan seemed to construe nan occurrence arsenic a telephone for Brand Sussex to beryllium elevated successful nan Palace hierarchy.'

However, Meghan reportedly felt 'snubbed' of appreciation by nan Royal Family aft nan mates returned to nan UK. 

When they did get home, connection soon dispersed that each was not good wrong nan palace, including rumours of a rift betwixt brothers and a falling retired betwixt Meghan and Kate Middleton.

Then successful 2020, Meghan and Harry announced they were stepping down arsenic elder moving members of nan royal family, and were later stripped of immoderate remaining titles and patronages they had.

Meghan Markle is 'addicted to drama' 

Appearing connected the New York Times podcast Sway, Tina Brown besides claimed that Megxit was a 'disaster for some sides' and said nan Duke and Duchess of Sussex are 'addicted to drama'.

Tina said nan mates made 'bad choices' and could person near nan Royal Family connected acold amended position if they weren't as 'hotheaded'.

She said: 'I actually deliberation location is simply a Harry-shaped spread successful nan royal family now. And Harry was beloved, actually, by nan British people. And group adored Meghan erstwhile she came into nan mix.

'So it was really very, very sad for everybody that it went truthful incorrect because they really request Harry and Meghan now.

The erstwhile Vanity Fair editor claimed that Harry and Meghan are 'addicted to drama' - and says 1 time nan Duke will 'wake up' and realise he's surviving successful Gwyneth Paltrow's Goop.

Speaking to nan Telegraph, nan master said nan brace can't extremity creating melodramatic scenes wherever they spell - claiming they appeared to beryllium 'addicted to drama'. And she warned nan duke appears to person been 'completely and utterly taken complete by Meghan and his full characteristic has changed'.

'I do mobility really it will end. '[Maybe] he'll aftermath up and realise he's surviving successful Goop and he has to get nan hellhole out, spell down nan pub and spot his friends,' she added.

Tina accuses Meghan of jumping connected trendy kindness causes

Speaking to nan Washington Post, Tina Brown based on that nan Duke and Duchess 'completely underestimated' what their life would beryllium for illustration without nan 'palace platform'.

In nan interview, nan editor claimed nan Duke of Sussex is 'in a overmuch amended spot' than Meghan acknowledgment to nan Invictus Games.

The royal group up nan sports events for injured servicemen and women successful 2014. 

Tina said: 'That's what his marque should be. Just hide everything but nan Invictus Games. It's authentic, he really was highly awesome arsenic a soldier.'

In contrast, Tina said Meghan has lacked attraction since leaving nan Firm and 'doesn't really person a brand'.

She continued: 'You consciousness for illustration she is grasping somewhat astatine immoderate is nan benignant of Twitter [cause] of nan moment.

'It's vaccinations. It's Ukraine. It's women's rights. It's, "hey - it's my 40th birthday, let's do a mentoring scheme."

'Nothing is really going anyplace for Meghan.' 

Meghan Markle is 'flawless astatine getting it each wrong' 

Earlier this month, Tina told Janice Min connected The Ankler podcast that she believes Meghan Markle has nan 'worst' judgement.

While promoting her caller Substack newsletter Fresh Hell, Tina said: 'The problem pinch Meghan is that she has nan worst judgement of anyone successful nan full world.

'She’s flawless astir getting it each wrong,' Brown ranted. 'All of her ideas are full crap, unfortunately.'

Princess Diana's biographer and nan writer of The Palace Papers: Inside The House Of Windsor - The Truth And The Turmoil, described Harry arsenic 'the lamb to nan bulldoze successful this situation.'

'And he conscionable benignant of blindly followed her for illustration a child, really,' she said.

Brown posted her first Substack past week, describing nan level arsenic a measurement to 'unload my observations, rants, news obsessions, and quality exchanges pinch nan wildly eclectic formed of characters who populate my seething inbox.' Her first station featured a scathing rant astir Donald Trump and his tally for president, describing her 'mounting panic' arsenic nan predetermination day draws closer.

Brown is besides nary alien to dishing ungraded connected nan royal family. Her astir caller book, The Palace Papers: Inside nan House of Windsor, nan Truth and nan Turmoil, was published successful 2022.

In 2007, she released biographical activity The Diana Chronicles.

In 2022, nan writer said nan mates made 'bad choices' and could person near nan royal family connected acold amended position if they weren't arsenic 'hotheaded' erstwhile they made nan determination to measurement backmost from their roles arsenic moving royals.

The writer besides branded Prince Harry a 'very impetuous man' and revealed really Palace advisors 'always thought he would leave'.

She said she was told it was because 'he was truthful fragile, truthful combustible, he was truthful unhappy, frankly, successful nan constraints of nan royal family'.